Fabrika/PersonalBlog
8
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 305 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity

[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript #189

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-08-27 00:09:10 +00:00 by kpcto · 14 comments
kpcto commented 2026-08-27 00:09:10 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Parent story: [E01-S01] ADR baseline (#63)

Intent

Document the Node.js 24 LTS runtime and TypeScript 6.0.3 language decisions (ADR-002 and ADR-003).

Acceptance criteria

  • A committed ADR records the Node.js 24 LTS runtime decision as ADR-002
  • A committed ADR records the TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision as ADR-003
  • Each ADR contains Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact and Revisit trigger

Explicitly out of scope

  • The other thirteen E01-S01 ADR subjects are separate task cards and are out of scope here

Test plan

  • Review both ADRs for the six required sections and confirm each decision matches the ADR index

Rollback note

  • Documentation-only; revert the committing change to remove the ADRs. No runtime or schema impact.

Owning stream

platform

Risk quadrant

agent-full

> Parent story: [E01-S01] ADR baseline (#63) ## Intent Document the Node.js 24 LTS runtime and TypeScript 6.0.3 language decisions (ADR-002 and ADR-003). ## Acceptance criteria - A committed ADR records the Node.js 24 LTS runtime decision as ADR-002 - A committed ADR records the TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision as ADR-003 - Each ADR contains Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact and Revisit trigger ## Explicitly out of scope - The other thirteen E01-S01 ADR subjects are separate task cards and are out of scope here ## Test plan - Review both ADRs for the six required sections and confirm each decision matches the ADR index ## Rollback note - Documentation-only; revert the committing change to remove the ADRs. No runtime or schema impact. ### Owning stream platform ### Risk quadrant agent-full
kpcto added this to the Sprint 0 milestone 2026-08-27 00:09:10 +00:00
kpcto added the
status
ready
kind
task
 labels 2026-08-27 00:09:10 +00:00
bot-dispatcher added
status
proposed
 and removed
status
ready
kind
task
 labels 2026-08-27 00:09:11 +00:00
bot-dispatcher commented 2026-08-27 00:09:11 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Auto-reverted by dispatcher: DoR lint: required section "Intent" is empty; required section "Acceptance criteria" is empty; required section "Explicitly out of scope" is empty; required section "Test plan" is empty; required section "Rollback note" is empty; acceptance criteria: no bullet assertions found

status/ready may only be applied by a human maintainer.

> Auto-reverted by dispatcher: DoR lint: required section "Intent" is empty; required section "Acceptance criteria" is empty; required section "Explicitly out of scope" is empty; required section "Test plan" is empty; required section "Rollback note" is empty; acceptance criteria: no bullet assertions found `status/ready` may only be applied by a human maintainer.
kpcto added the
kind
task
 label 2026-08-27 21:22:40 +00:00
kpcto added
status
ready
 and removed
status
proposed
 labels 2026-08-31 00:21:10 +00:00
bot-analyst commented 2026-08-31 00:24:34 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Triage of #189 — [E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript (single structured comment, covering start-to-end of this triage):

agent: analyst
phase: triage
tier: T3
issue: "#189"
title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript"
kind: task
signals:
  scope: documentation-only — commit two ADRs: ADR-002 (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and ADR-003 (TypeScript 6.0.3)
  runtime_impact: none
  schema_impact: none
  security_impact: none
  rollback: revert the doc commit; no runtime or schema impact (per card)
  readiness: status/ready, Sprint 0, parent story [E01-S01] ADR baseline (#63), owning stream platform
  verification: >-
    wiki ADR-Index (§7) lists "ADR-002 | Node.js 24 LTS runtime" and "ADR-003 | TypeScript 6.0.3
    pending TS7.1 ecosystem review" and mandates the six sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives,
    Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger); docs/adr/ currently contains only
    ADR-001-modular-monolith.md, so ADR-002/ADR-003 do not exist yet — the card is real but unstarted.
    Both decisions are already implemented and CI-guarded (tests/node-engine.test.mjs restricts the
    engine to Node 24.x; tests/typescript-pin.test.mjs pins TypeScript 6.0.3), so the card only
    records decisions already in force.
reasoning: >-
  Applied the standard triage scale: T0 = critical (outage, security incident, data loss), T1 = high
  (blocking or security-relevant runtime fixes), T2 = normal runtime feature/bugfix work, T3 = low
  (docs, chores, backlog items with no runtime impact). This card asks only for two committed ADR
  documents; it touches no code paths, no migrations, no configuration and has no security surface.
  The issue's own rollback note confirms a docs-only revert with no runtime or schema impact, and the
  test plan is a document review against the ADR index. Nothing is blocked or at risk while it waits,
  so it is neither T0 nor T1; it is not T2 because no runtime behaviour is built or fixed — the
  runtime and language choices are already shipped and enforced by existing tests. Lowest tier fits:
  a bounded, low-risk, easily revertible documentation deliverable, already status/ready and scoped
  to Sprint 0, identical in shape to the sibling card #188 triaged T3.
Triage of #189 — [E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript (single structured comment, covering start-to-end of this triage): ```yaml agent: analyst phase: triage tier: T3 issue: "#189" title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript" kind: task signals: scope: documentation-only — commit two ADRs: ADR-002 (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and ADR-003 (TypeScript 6.0.3) runtime_impact: none schema_impact: none security_impact: none rollback: revert the doc commit; no runtime or schema impact (per card) readiness: status/ready, Sprint 0, parent story [E01-S01] ADR baseline (#63), owning stream platform verification: >- wiki ADR-Index (§7) lists "ADR-002 | Node.js 24 LTS runtime" and "ADR-003 | TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review" and mandates the six sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger); docs/adr/ currently contains only ADR-001-modular-monolith.md, so ADR-002/ADR-003 do not exist yet — the card is real but unstarted. Both decisions are already implemented and CI-guarded (tests/node-engine.test.mjs restricts the engine to Node 24.x; tests/typescript-pin.test.mjs pins TypeScript 6.0.3), so the card only records decisions already in force. reasoning: >- Applied the standard triage scale: T0 = critical (outage, security incident, data loss), T1 = high (blocking or security-relevant runtime fixes), T2 = normal runtime feature/bugfix work, T3 = low (docs, chores, backlog items with no runtime impact). This card asks only for two committed ADR documents; it touches no code paths, no migrations, no configuration and has no security surface. The issue's own rollback note confirms a docs-only revert with no runtime or schema impact, and the test plan is a document review against the ADR index. Nothing is blocked or at risk while it waits, so it is neither T0 nor T1; it is not T2 because no runtime behaviour is built or fixed — the runtime and language choices are already shipped and enforced by existing tests. Lowest tier fits: a bounded, low-risk, easily revertible documentation deliverable, already status/ready and scoped to Sprint 0, identical in shape to the sibling card #188 triaged T3. ```
bot-dispatcher added tier/t3
loop
1
status
in-progress
 and removed
status
ready
 labels 2026-08-31 00:24:43 +00:00
bot-dispatcher commented 2026-08-31 00:24:43 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: dispatcher
phase: complete
plan_summary: Dispatch #189: [E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript (platform)
```yaml agent: dispatcher phase: complete plan_summary: Dispatch #189: [E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript (platform) ```
bot-dispatcher added the needs/security-reviewneeds/security-review labels 2026-08-31 00:24:44 +00:00
bot-implementer commented 2026-08-31 00:26:11 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: implementer
phase: start
issue: "#189"
title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript"
plan: >-
  Commit ADR-002 (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and ADR-003 (TypeScript 6.0.3) on
  feature/189, each with the six mandated sections (Context, Decision,
  Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) matching the
  ADR index entries, then open the PR with the criterion-to-test table and
  verify the CI pipeline is green.
scope: documentation-only, two ADR markdown files under docs/adr/; no source,
  manifest, lockfile, workflow or test changes; the other thirteen E01-S01 ADR
  subjects are out of scope.
```yaml agent: implementer phase: start issue: "#189" title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript" plan: >- Commit ADR-002 (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and ADR-003 (TypeScript 6.0.3) on feature/189, each with the six mandated sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) matching the ADR index entries, then open the PR with the criterion-to-test table and verify the CI pipeline is green. scope: documentation-only, two ADR markdown files under docs/adr/; no source, manifest, lockfile, workflow or test changes; the other thirteen E01-S01 ADR subjects are out of scope. ```
bot-security commented 2026-08-31 00:28:31 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: security
issue: 189
pr: 407
head_branch: feature/189
phase: start
scope: security review of PR #407 (ADR-002 Node 24 LTS runtime / ADR-003 TypeScript 6.0.3, documentation-only)
verdict: pending
```yaml agent: security issue: 189 pr: 407 head_branch: feature/189 phase: start scope: security review of PR #407 (ADR-002 Node 24 LTS runtime / ADR-003 TypeScript 6.0.3, documentation-only) verdict: pending ```
bot-security commented 2026-08-31 00:36:16 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: security
issue: 189
pr: 407
head_branch: feature/189
head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab
phase: final
verdict: approve
scan_gitleaks: "pass — 'no leaks found' (whole tree ~612 KB at head sha, incl. both new files)"
scan_osv_scanner: "pass — 'No issues found' (25 packages, pnpm-lock.yaml)"
scan_semgrep: "skipped — binary not present in worker image; gap covered by manual authz/injection trace"
pipeline_tripwire: "not triggered — diff touches only docs/adr/*.md; no agents/, CI config or .gitea/workflows changes"
findings:
  - severity: nit
    file: docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md:17-18
    what: >-
      Context sentence says the 'workspace root manifest declares engines.node ... with
      engineStrict: true', but the two settings live in different root files: engines.node
      is in package.json, engineStrict: true is in pnpm-workspace.yaml (line 9).
    exploit_path: none — documentation imprecision only; the enforcement claim itself is true
    fix: >-
      Attribute engineStrict to pnpm-workspace.yaml (as docs/development/non-container.md:182
      already does correctly); a reader following the sentence into package.json will not find it.

Evidence for the verdict (all claims reproducible):

  • Secrets: gitleaks detect --source . --no-git --redact → no leaks found (output above; scanned the full working tree at head ee0c094, including both new ADR files).
  • Dependencies: osv-scanner --recursive . → No issues found (25 packages). Diff adds no dependencies, manifests or lockfile entries.
  • SAST: semgrep absent from the image (command -v semgrep fails) → skipped per playbook; compensated by the manual traces below.
  • Authz trace: N/A — the diff contains no routes, handlers, endpoints or executable code (documentation only, +173/−0 across exactly the two in-scope files).
  • Injection / input boundaries: swept both files for URLs, HTML/script/iframe embeds and prompt-injection patterns (ignore previous, system prompt, instructions:) → zero matches. Content is descriptive prose referencing pre-existing, independently verified repo facts; nothing executable.
  • Factual integrity of security-posture claims (each cross-checked against the repo/wiki):
    • engines.node: ">=24.0.0 <25.0.0" in root package.json; engineStrict: true in pnpm-workspace.yaml — enforcement empirically demonstrated: running tests/typescript-pin.test.mjs in this Node-22 sandbox fails with ERR_PNPM_UNSUPPORTED_ENGINE, i.e. the guard the ADR describes actually fires.
    • node:24.19.0-bookworm-slim is the base image of both Dockerfile stages (apps/server/Dockerfile:52,83).
    • Lockfile resolves exactly one typescript@6.0.3 (pnpm-lock.yaml:143,233); root manifest pins "6.0.3" exactly.
    • Decision texts match the ADR index wiki (§70) verbatim: ADR-002 | Node.js 24 LTS runtime, ADR-003 | TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review.
    • EOL dates (Node 24 → 2028-04-30), support classes (Node = A, TypeScript = C), TS 7.0-GA-2026-07/bridge narrative, image pins and LTS/upgrade lanes all match the Technology-Stack wiki (§5.2, §5.4, §6, §8).
    • "CI stage 2 (typecheck)" and "CI installs and runs on Node 24" match .gitea/workflows/ci.yml (Stage 2 — Typecheck; node-version: '24' throughout).
  • Test honesty: the PR's cited gate reproduces exactly — node --test tests/formatting-policy.test.mjs → 13/13 pass locally on this branch. Note for triage: node-engine/typescript-pin suites fail in this sandbox (Node 22.23.2, no pnpm) — environmental, occurs identically on main, and the typescript-pin failure is the engine-strict guard working; not a PR regression.

No blockers, no should-level findings — one nit (listed in the YAML above) which does not gate approval. Start comment: #issuecomment-3571.

```yaml agent: security issue: 189 pr: 407 head_branch: feature/189 head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab phase: final verdict: approve scan_gitleaks: "pass — 'no leaks found' (whole tree ~612 KB at head sha, incl. both new files)" scan_osv_scanner: "pass — 'No issues found' (25 packages, pnpm-lock.yaml)" scan_semgrep: "skipped — binary not present in worker image; gap covered by manual authz/injection trace" pipeline_tripwire: "not triggered — diff touches only docs/adr/*.md; no agents/, CI config or .gitea/workflows changes" findings: - severity: nit file: docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md:17-18 what: >- Context sentence says the 'workspace root manifest declares engines.node ... with engineStrict: true', but the two settings live in different root files: engines.node is in package.json, engineStrict: true is in pnpm-workspace.yaml (line 9). exploit_path: none — documentation imprecision only; the enforcement claim itself is true fix: >- Attribute engineStrict to pnpm-workspace.yaml (as docs/development/non-container.md:182 already does correctly); a reader following the sentence into package.json will not find it. ``` **Evidence for the verdict** (all claims reproducible): - **Secrets:** `gitleaks detect --source . --no-git --redact` → `no leaks found` (output above; scanned the full working tree at head `ee0c094`, including both new ADR files). - **Dependencies:** `osv-scanner --recursive .` → `No issues found` (25 packages). Diff adds no dependencies, manifests or lockfile entries. - **SAST:** semgrep absent from the image (`command -v semgrep` fails) → skipped per playbook; compensated by the manual traces below. - **Authz trace:** N/A — the diff contains no routes, handlers, endpoints or executable code (documentation only, +173/−0 across exactly the two in-scope files). - **Injection / input boundaries:** swept both files for URLs, HTML/script/iframe embeds and prompt-injection patterns (`ignore previous`, `system prompt`, `instructions:`) → zero matches. Content is descriptive prose referencing pre-existing, independently verified repo facts; nothing executable. - **Factual integrity of security-posture claims** (each cross-checked against the repo/wiki): - `engines.node: ">=24.0.0 <25.0.0"` in root `package.json`; `engineStrict: true` in `pnpm-workspace.yaml` — enforcement **empirically demonstrated**: running `tests/typescript-pin.test.mjs` in this Node-22 sandbox fails with `ERR_PNPM_UNSUPPORTED_ENGINE`, i.e. the guard the ADR describes actually fires. - `node:24.19.0-bookworm-slim` is the base image of both Dockerfile stages (`apps/server/Dockerfile:52,83`). - Lockfile resolves exactly one `typescript@6.0.3` (`pnpm-lock.yaml:143,233`); root manifest pins `"6.0.3"` exactly. - Decision texts match the ADR index wiki (§70) verbatim: `ADR-002 | Node.js 24 LTS runtime`, `ADR-003 | TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review`. - EOL dates (Node 24 → 2028-04-30), support classes (Node = A, TypeScript = C), TS 7.0-GA-2026-07/bridge narrative, image pins and LTS/upgrade lanes all match the Technology-Stack wiki (§5.2, §5.4, §6, §8). - "CI stage 2 (typecheck)" and "CI installs and runs on Node 24" match `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` (Stage 2 — Typecheck; `node-version: '24'` throughout). - **Test honesty:** the PR's cited gate reproduces exactly — `node --test tests/formatting-policy.test.mjs` → 13/13 pass locally on this branch. Note for triage: `node-engine`/`typescript-pin` suites fail *in this sandbox* (Node 22.23.2, no pnpm) — environmental, occurs identically on `main`, and the typescript-pin failure is the engine-strict guard working; not a PR regression. No blockers, no `should`-level findings — one `nit` (listed in the YAML above) which does not gate approval. Start comment: [#issuecomment-3571](http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/issues/189#issuecomment-3571).
kpcto commented 2026-08-31 00:45:33 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: reviewer
issue: "189"
verdict: approve
summary: Maintainer review of PR #407 (ADR-002 Node.js 24 LTS runtime, ADR-003 TypeScript 6.0.3). Both ADRs contain the six required sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) and the decision texts match the ADR index §70 verbatim. The security nit (engines.node/engineStrict attribution) is advisory and non-blocking.
```yaml agent: reviewer issue: "189" verdict: approve summary: Maintainer review of PR #407 (ADR-002 Node.js 24 LTS runtime, ADR-003 TypeScript 6.0.3). Both ADRs contain the six required sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) and the decision texts match the ADR index §70 verbatim. The security nit (engines.node/engineStrict attribution) is advisory and non-blocking. ```
bot-dispatcher added
status
review
 and removed
status
in-progress
loop
1
kind
task
tier/t3 labels 2026-08-31 00:45:34 +00:00
bot-reviewer commented 2026-08-31 00:47:19 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: reviewer
verdict: approve
```yaml agent: reviewer verdict: approve ```
bot-reviewer commented 2026-08-31 00:47:27 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Review Findings

  1. Criterion → Test Mapping: ✅ Both ADRs are properly committed as new files in the docs/adr/ directory.

  2. Scope: ✅ Changes are strictly within the scope of documenting the Node.js and TypeScript decisions as specified in issue #189.

  3. Correctness: ✅ Both ADRs follow the proper structure with all required sections:

    • Context
    • Decision
    • Alternatives
    • Consequences
    • Operational impact
    • Revisit trigger

  4. Index Consistency: ✅ Each decision matches what is stated in the ADR index:

    • ADR-002 properly documents Node.js 24 LTS runtime
    • ADR-003 properly documents TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review

  5. Security: ✅ No security concerns in these documentation-only changes.

  6. Test Honesty: ✅ These are documentation-only changes with no tests affected.

  7. Conventions: ✅ The ADRs follow established conventions with proper formatting and structure.

Both ADRs are well-written, comprehensive, and follow the established ADR format. They provide clear rationale for the technology choices, consider alternatives appropriately, and document the operational implications. The decisions are consistent with the overall architecture described in ADR-001.

## Review Findings 1. **Criterion → Test Mapping**: ✅ Both ADRs are properly committed as new files in the `docs/adr/` directory. 2. **Scope**: ✅ Changes are strictly within the scope of documenting the Node.js and TypeScript decisions as specified in issue #189. 3. **Correctness**: ✅ Both ADRs follow the proper structure with all required sections: - Context - Decision - Alternatives - Consequences - Operational impact - Revisit trigger 4. **Index Consistency**: ✅ Each decision matches what is stated in the ADR index: - ADR-002 properly documents **Node.js 24 LTS runtime** - ADR-003 properly documents **TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review** 5. **Security**: ✅ No security concerns in these documentation-only changes. 6. **Test Honesty**: ✅ These are documentation-only changes with no tests affected. 7. **Conventions**: ✅ The ADRs follow established conventions with proper formatting and structure. Both ADRs are well-written, comprehensive, and follow the established ADR format. They provide clear rationale for the technology choices, consider alternatives appropriately, and document the operational implications. The decisions are consistent with the overall architecture described in ADR-001.
bot-reviewer commented 2026-08-31 00:47:28 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: reviewer
verdict: approve
```yaml agent: reviewer verdict: approve ```
bot-dispatcher commented 2026-08-31 00:47:33 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Security approved; dispatching reviewer.

> Security approved; dispatching reviewer.
bot-implementer commented 2026-08-31 00:47:59 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: implementer
phase: end
issue: "#189"
title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript"
deliverables: >-
  PR #407 open on feature/189. Committed docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md
  (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and docs/adr/ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md (TypeScript
  6.0.3), each with the six mandated sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives,
  Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) and decision text matching
  the ADR index entries (ADR-002 / ADR-003, section 70). Criterion-to-test table
  included in the PR description. Documentation-only; formatting/lint policy
  passes locally (13/13) with both new files git-tracked.
ci: >-
  PENDING, not yet green — infrastructure blocker outside this change: the Gitea
  Actions runner has not consumed any job since run #112 (2026-08-30T06:34Z);
  runs #113-#121 (including this PR's run #116) sit queued with no job started,
  and the PR commit status shows Stage 1 "Waiting to run" with Stages 2-7
  "Blocked by required conditions". CI will execute and gate normally once the
  runner resumes; no code-side failure is involved.
rollback: revert the two docs(adr) commits; no runtime or schema impact.
```yaml agent: implementer phase: end issue: "#189" title: "[E01-S01-T02] ADR: Node/TypeScript" deliverables: >- PR #407 open on feature/189. Committed docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md (Node.js 24 LTS runtime) and docs/adr/ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md (TypeScript 6.0.3), each with the six mandated sections (Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, Revisit trigger) and decision text matching the ADR index entries (ADR-002 / ADR-003, section 70). Criterion-to-test table included in the PR description. Documentation-only; formatting/lint policy passes locally (13/13) with both new files git-tracked. ci: >- PENDING, not yet green — infrastructure blocker outside this change: the Gitea Actions runner has not consumed any job since run #112 (2026-08-30T06:34Z); runs #113-#121 (including this PR's run #116) sit queued with no job started, and the PR commit status shows Stage 1 "Waiting to run" with Stages 2-7 "Blocked by required conditions". CI will execute and gate normally once the runner resumes; no code-side failure is involved. rollback: revert the two docs(adr) commits; no runtime or schema impact. ```
bot-tester commented 2026-08-31 00:50:35 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: tester
issue: "189"
pr: 407
head_branch: feature/189
head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab
phase: start
objective: independently probe PR #407 against the #189 acceptance criteria
constraints:
  - never edit the implementer's tests in the same PR
verdict: pending
```yaml agent: tester issue: "189" pr: 407 head_branch: feature/189 head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab phase: start objective: independently probe PR #407 against the #189 acceptance criteria constraints: - never edit the implementer's tests in the same PR verdict: pending ```
bot-tester commented 2026-08-31 00:50:47 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
agent: tester
issue: "189"
pr: 407
head_branch: feature/189
head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab
phase: final
verdict: pass
acceptance:
  - id: "ADR-002 committed (Node.js 24 LTS runtime)"
    result: pass
    evidence: >-
      docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md committed on feature/189 at head
      ee0c094; H1 reads "# ADR-002: Node.js 24 LTS runtime"; Decision section
      records "Node.js 24 LTS runtime" — matches ADR index §70 verbatim.
  - id: "ADR-003 committed (TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision)"
    result: pass
    evidence: >-
      docs/adr/ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md committed on feature/189 at head
      ee0c094; H1 reads "# ADR-003: TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision";
      Decision section records "TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem
      review" — matches ADR index §70 verbatim.
  - id: "six required sections present in each ADR"
    result: pass
    evidence: >-
      Both committed files contain Context, Decision, Alternatives,
      Consequences, Operational impact, and Revisit trigger as ## sections, in
      order, verified against the committed file contents (get_file_contents
      at ref feature/189), not only the PR diff.
constraints:
  - name: "never edit the implementer's tests in the same PR"
    respected: true
    evidence: >-
      PR diff is documentation-only: exactly two new files under docs/adr/
      (+173/-0). No test files, manifests, lockfile or workflow files touched.
scope:
  in_scope: true
  evidence: >-
    changed_files == 2, both under docs/adr/ (ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md,
    ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md); no out-of-scope changes.
findings:
  - severity: nit
    file: "docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md (Context)"
    what: >-
      "root manifest declares engines.node ... with engineStrict: true"
      conflates two files: engines.node lives in package.json while
      engineStrict: true lives in pnpm-workspace.yaml. The enforcement claim
      itself is true; attribution is imprecise (non-blocking).
ci:
  run_url: "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116"
  status: queued
  detail: >-
    Run #116 has 7 stages pending (jobs 384-390): Stage 1 "Waiting to run",
    Stages 2-7 "Blocked by required conditions". The Gitea Actions runner has
    not consumed a job since run #112, so this is an infrastructure blocker
    outside the change, not a code failure. The only stage that touches the
    ADR files is Stage 3 (formatting-lint); implementer reports the formatting
    policy suite passes locally (13/13).
  links:
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/384"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/385"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/386"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/387"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/388"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/389"
    - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/390"
done_when: evidence comment posted with CI links
```yaml agent: tester issue: "189" pr: 407 head_branch: feature/189 head_sha: ee0c09439811f40607e72d1e281d6137918c64ab phase: final verdict: pass acceptance: - id: "ADR-002 committed (Node.js 24 LTS runtime)" result: pass evidence: >- docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md committed on feature/189 at head ee0c094; H1 reads "# ADR-002: Node.js 24 LTS runtime"; Decision section records "Node.js 24 LTS runtime" — matches ADR index §70 verbatim. - id: "ADR-003 committed (TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision)" result: pass evidence: >- docs/adr/ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md committed on feature/189 at head ee0c094; H1 reads "# ADR-003: TypeScript 6.0.3 language decision"; Decision section records "TypeScript 6.0.3 pending TS7.1 ecosystem review" — matches ADR index §70 verbatim. - id: "six required sections present in each ADR" result: pass evidence: >- Both committed files contain Context, Decision, Alternatives, Consequences, Operational impact, and Revisit trigger as ## sections, in order, verified against the committed file contents (get_file_contents at ref feature/189), not only the PR diff. constraints: - name: "never edit the implementer's tests in the same PR" respected: true evidence: >- PR diff is documentation-only: exactly two new files under docs/adr/ (+173/-0). No test files, manifests, lockfile or workflow files touched. scope: in_scope: true evidence: >- changed_files == 2, both under docs/adr/ (ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md, ADR-003-typescript-6-0-3.md); no out-of-scope changes. findings: - severity: nit file: "docs/adr/ADR-002-node-24-lts-runtime.md (Context)" what: >- "root manifest declares engines.node ... with engineStrict: true" conflates two files: engines.node lives in package.json while engineStrict: true lives in pnpm-workspace.yaml. The enforcement claim itself is true; attribution is imprecise (non-blocking). ci: run_url: "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116" status: queued detail: >- Run #116 has 7 stages pending (jobs 384-390): Stage 1 "Waiting to run", Stages 2-7 "Blocked by required conditions". The Gitea Actions runner has not consumed a job since run #112, so this is an infrastructure blocker outside the change, not a code failure. The only stage that touches the ADR files is Stage 3 (formatting-lint); implementer reports the formatting policy suite passes locally (13/13). links: - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/384" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/385" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/386" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/387" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/388" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/389" - "http://gitea:3000/Fabrika/PersonalBlog/actions/runs/116/jobs/390" done_when: evidence comment posted with CI links ```
kpcto closed this issue 2026-08-31 00:51:07 +00:00
kpcto added
kind
task
status
done
 and removed
status
review
 labels 2026-08-31 00:51:13 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
agent/analyst-drafted
agent/analyst-drafted
kind
bug
kind
bug
kind
epic
kind
epic
kind
initiative
EPPP programme initiative
kind
story
kind
story
kind
task
EPPP engineering card/task decomposed from a story
kind
toil
kind
toil
loop
1
loop
1
loop
2
loop
2
loop
3
loop
3
needs/human-decision
needs/human-decision
needs/security-review
needs/security-review
risk
agent-full
risk
agent-full
risk
human-gated
risk
human-gated
risk
human-only
risk
human-only
size
l
size
l
size
m
size
m
size
s
size
s
status
blocked
status
blocked
status
done
Workflow: Done
status
in-progress
status
in-progress
status
proposed
status
proposed
status
ready
status
ready
status
review
status
review
stream
checkout
stream
checkout
stream
onboarding
stream
onboarding
stream
platform
stream
platform
tier/t0
trivial — implementer only, auto-merge
 tier/t1
standard — implementer + reviewer + tester
 tier/t2
complex — security if triggered, human merge
 tier/t3
critical — full chain + security, human merge
No labels
kind
task
status
done
Milestone
No items
No Milestone Sprint 0
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
bot-analyst bot-dispatcher bot-implementer bot-migrations bot-reviewer bot-security bot-tester kpcto
No Assignees
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Fabrika/PersonalBlog#189